Aqueous proton transfer across single layer graphene
Evidence and attribution¶
Authority of statements
Prose below summarizes the text in the ingested pdf_path and extract. A fuller bibliographic record for the peer-reviewed article may appear under a different corpus slug; see Reader notes.
Summary¶
Experimental second-harmonic probing of silica beneath monolayer graphene on fused silica shows reversible protonation/deprotonation of silanols when the overlying aqueous pH is cycled, arguing for proton passage through the graphene. Macroscopic pinhole transport is argued against; permeation is attributed to rare atomic defects. Atomistic simulations reported in the manuscript describe comparatively facile water-mediated, Grotthuss-type pathways at hydroxyl-terminated defect motifs, while ether-bridged defects suppress exchange, and He/H transfer barriers are unfavorable—supporting selective aqueous proton permeation (abstract narrative; extract pages 1–2).
Methods¶
Experiments (SHG on silica through graphene)¶
- Monolayer graphene on fused silica with bulk aqueous pH cycled at room temperature and constant ionic strength; interfacial second-harmonic generation (SHG) probes silanol protonation on the silica side (~120 fs pulses, pulse energies kept below graphene damage thresholds) (extract).
Excluding macroscopic pinholes¶
- The article argues against pinhole-dominated transport using microscopy and permeation-order reasoning detailed in the full text (Summary).
Atomistic modeling (supporting interpretation)¶
- Simulations compare water-mediated Grotthuss-type pathways at hydroxyl-terminated defect motifs versus blocked exchange for ether-bridged defect terminations, and discuss He/H transfer barriers as unfavorable relative to aqueous protons (Summary).
Canonical citation path¶
- Peer-reviewed packaging is curated on
[[2015achtyl-nat-aqueous-proton]]; use that entry for DOI, pagination, and figure references when available.
1 — MD application (atomistic simulations reported in the manuscript)¶
- Engine / code, system sizes, ensembles, timesteps, thermostats, production lengths: N/A in this wiki summary—the ingested
Achtyl_graphene_proton_archive.pdfexcerpt used here does not spell out full MD control parameters; read the Nature Communications article on[[2015achtyl-nat-aqueous-proton]](and SI) for authoritative simulation settings. - Replica / enhanced sampling: N/A — not stated in the excerpt summarized here.
2 — Force-field training¶
N/A — not a parameterization study.
3 — Static QM¶
N/A — the excerpt-level summary emphasizes classical/DFT-hybrid-style modeling narratives as interpreted in the paper; confirm electronic-structure details in the version-of-record PDF.
Findings¶
1 — Outcomes and mechanisms¶
Cycling pH produces reversible protonation/deprotonation of interfacial silanols probed by SHG, interpreted as protons traversing the monolayer to participate in acid–base chemistry at the silica. After excluding pinhole-dominated transport, permeation is attributed to rare atomic defects. The modeling narrative distinguishes low-energy water-mediated pathways at certain defect terminations from blocked exchange for ether-bridged motifs, supporting selective aqueous proton permeation through an otherwise inert sheet (abstract narrative; extract pages 1–2).
2 — Comparisons¶
- Experiment (SHG) vs pinhole transport hypotheses; atomistic scenarios compared qualitatively for defect terminations (article narrative in excerpt).
3 — Sensitivity¶
- Aqueous pH cycling at room temperature drives the SHG response reported in the excerpt.
4 — Limitations / outlook¶
- Archive PDF vs version-of-record packaging; see ## Limitations.
5 — Corpus / KB honesty¶
This slug’s pdf_path is an archive/working PDF; canonical DOI, venue, and pagination live on [[2015achtyl-nat-aqueous-proton]]. Evidence anchors: normalized/extracts/2014geiger-venue-paper_p1-2.txt.
Limitations¶
The ingested file is an archive/working PDF (Achtyl_graphene_proton_archive.pdf), not the Nature Communications version of record; cite the published article for definitive metadata.
Reader notes (navigation)¶
The peer-reviewed article for this work is curated as 2015achtyl-nat-aqueous-proton (DOI 10.1038/ncomms7539). Use that page for venue, pagination, and canonical citation strings.
Citations and evidence anchors¶
- Extract
normalized/extracts/2014geiger-venue-paper_p1-2.txt(pages 1–2 of ingested PDF).